Wareham v. State
This text of 678 So. 2d 432 (Wareham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Francis X. WAREHAM, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Francis X. Wareham, Polk City, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
*433 GRIFFIN, Judge.
In these two cases, which we consolidate and consider together, defendant appeals the summary denial of his third and his fourth[1] Rule 3.800(a) motions to correct sentences he received for burglary, after violation of probation, and for manslaughter.
The trial court correctly ruled that these motions are frivolous and constitute an abuse of the court's process. There is no need to indulge such filings until their number approaches a dozen. Accordingly, we order that appellant shall not be permitted to file any further pro se attacks upon his 1989 judgment and sentences.
AFFIRMED with directions.
GOSHORN and ANTOON, JJ., concur.
NOTES
[1] It is denominated a "supplement."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
678 So. 2d 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wareham-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.