Wareham v. Hummel

Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas

Wareham v. Hummel

3 Pennyp. 157

CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County

DecidedMay 31, 1882

DocketNo. 72

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Pennyp. 157 (Wareham v. Hummel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wareham v. Hummel, 3 Pennyp. 157 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

— Per Curiam :

The law of this case was clearly stated and explained to the jury in a very lucid charge by the learned Judge, and the facts were fairly submitted. It was earnestly contended that there was a duty incumbent on Hummel when he paid the mortgage to see that it was satisfied of record. The jury have found that it was not assigned by Hummel’s direction. We think the charge, as complained of in the fourth assignment, was entirely right and it disposes of the whole case.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Per Curiam :

The law of this case was clearly stated and explained to the jury in a very lucid charge by the learned Judge, and the facts were fairly submitted. It was earnestly contended that there was a duty incumbent on Hummel when he paid the mortgage to see that it was satisfied of record. The jury have found that it was not assigned by Hummel’s direction. We think the charge, as complained of in the fourth assignment, was entirely right and it disposes of the whole case.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Pennyp. 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wareham-v-hummel-pactcompldauphi-1882.