Ware v. Wunder Brewing Co. of San Francisco

Ninth Circuit

Ware v. Wunder Brewing Co. of San Francisco

160 F. 79, 87 C.C.A. 235, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4178

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 3, 1908

DocketNo. 1,434

StatusPublished

This text of 160 F. 79 (Ware v. Wunder Brewing Co. of San Francisco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ware v. Wunder Brewing Co. of San Francisco, 160 F. 79, 87 C.C.A. 235, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4178 (9th Cir. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

This action was brought by the trustee of the estate of the bankrupt to set aside an alleged preference. The case is brought here by writ of error.

We cannot agree with the counsel for the plaintiff in error that there was a total want of evidence to support the findings of the trial court. Such being the case, it is well settled that the appellate court cannot weigh the evidence, but must take the facts as found by the court below. Stanley v. Supervisors, 121 U. S. 547, 7 Sup. Ct. 1234, 30 L. Ed. 1000; Pacific Postal Telegraph C. Co. v. Fleischner, 66 Fed. 902, 14 C. C. A. 166.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

This action was brought by the trustee of the estate of the bankrupt to set aside an alleged preference. The case is brought here by writ of error.

We cannot agree with the counsel for the plaintiff in error that there was a total want of evidence to support the findings of the trial court. Such being the case, it is well settled that the appellate court cannot weigh the evidence, but must take the facts as found by the court below. Stanley v. Supervisors, 121 U. S. 547, 7 Sup. Ct. 1234, 30 L. Ed. 1000; Pacific Postal Telegraph C. Co. v. Fleischner, 66 Fed. 902, 14 C. C. A. 166.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 F. 79, 87 C.C.A. 235, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ware-v-wunder-brewing-co-of-san-francisco-ca9-1908.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack