Ware v. Ware, 2008ca00004 (12-15-2008)
This text of 2008 Ohio 6670 (Ware v. Ware, 2008ca00004 (12-15-2008)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
{¶ 3} The parties later appeared before the trial court for a pretrial at which the issues of spousal support, child support and division of assets/allocations of debts were discussed. In the trial court's judgment entry issued December 7, 2007, the trial court found that neither party could afford the marital residence and they wished to litigate personal goods. The trial court then ordered that the temporary orders of the court were to be modified as follows:
{¶ 4} "The marital real estate and all contents shall be immediately sold at public auction by Kiko Auction and Realty. The closing shall occur on or before March 1, 2008. In the event of a short sale, the court will order disbursement of the 401(k) funds to complete the sale. All parties/counsel shall cooperate with Kiko to effect this sale. The parties may exempt items of personal property if submitted on an agreed list submitted by both counsel to the court on or before December 24, 2007."
{¶ 5} The trial court set the trial on Appellant's complaint for March 20, 2008. *Page 3
{¶ 6} On January 4, 2008, Appellant filed her notice of appeal of the trial court's December 7, 2007 judgment entry.
{¶ 7} Appellant raises one Assignment of Error:
{¶ 8} "I. THE TRIAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION IN ORDERING ALL PROPERTY TO BE SOLD WITHOUT CONSIDERATION OF ITS STATUS AS MARITAL OR NON-MARITAL PROPERTY AND WITHOUT TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION THE DEBT OF THE PARTIES."
{¶ 10} We find the December 7, 2007 judgment entry is a temporary order. A temporary order is interlocutory in nature. Because such orders are subject to modification by the trial court, interlocutory orders are not immediately appealable. Brooks v. Brooks (1996),
{¶ 11} Accordingly, the appeal of the judgment of the Stark County Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Division, is dismissed.
*Page 5Delaney, J., Hoffman, P.J. and Edwards, J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2008 Ohio 6670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ware-v-ware-2008ca00004-12-15-2008-ohioctapp-2008.