Ware v. State

17 S.W. 624, 21 Tex. Ct. App. 328, 1886 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 140
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ware v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 Tex. Ct. App. 521
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 15, 1886·No. No. 3907·Published

Opinion

White, Presiding Judge.

It has been repeatedly held under the provisions of Article 441, Code of Criminal Procedure, that a judgment nisi is fatally defective, and will not sustain a judgment final, rendered upon a forfeited bail bond or recognizance, unless it states that the same will be made final unless good cause be shown at the next term of the court why the principal did not appear. (McIntyre v. The State, 19 Texas Ct. App., 443, and authorities cited therein.)

Tested by this rule, the judgment nisi in the present case is fatally defective, wherefore the final judgment as rendered m the court below is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ware v. State, 17 S.W. 624, 21 Tex. Ct. App. 328, 1886 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 140 (Tex. Ct. App. 1886).

17 S.W. 624 (Ware v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.