Ware v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Ware v. State

213 P. 1119, 23 Okla. Crim. 158, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 171

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 14, 1923

DocketNo. A-4289.

StatusPublished

This text of 213 P. 1119 (Ware v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ware v. State, 213 P. 1119, 23 Okla. Crim. 158, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 171 (Okla. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Luther Ware, was convicted on a charge of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, and in accordance with the' verdict of the jury was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 30 days and to pay (a fine of $100. From the judgment rendered on the 10th day of December, 1921, an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on April 10, 1922, a petition in error with case-made. On the 14th day of March, 1923, the plaintiff in error by his counsel of record moved the court to dismiss his appeal, which motion is sustained, and the appeal is hereby dismissed, and the cause remanded to the lower court, with direction to carry intoi effect its judgment. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Luther Ware, was convicted on a charge of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, and in accordance with the' verdict of the jury was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 30 days and to pay (a fine of $100. From the judgment rendered on the 10th day of December, 1921, an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on April 10, 1922, a petition in error with case-made. On the 14th day of March, 1923, the plaintiff in error by his counsel of record moved the court to dismiss his appeal, which motion is sustained, and the appeal is hereby dismissed, and the cause remanded to the lower court, with direction to carry intoi effect its judgment. Mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

213 P. 1119, 23 Okla. Crim. 158, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ware-v-state-oklacrimapp-1923.