Ware v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Ware v. State

213 P. 1119, 23 Okla. Crim. 158, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 171

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided March 14, 1923·No. No. A-4289.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Luther Ware, was convicted on a charge of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, and in accordance with the' verdict of the jury was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 30 days and to pay (a fine of $100. From the judgment rendered on the 10th day of December, 1921, an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on April 10, 1922, a petition in error with case-made. On the 14th day of March, 1923, the plaintiff in error by his counsel of record moved the court to dismiss his appeal, which motion is sustained, and the appeal is hereby dismissed, and the cause remanded to the lower court, with direction to carry intoi effect its judgment. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Luther Ware, was convicted on a charge of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, and in accordance with the' verdict of the jury was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 30 days and to pay (a fine of $100. From the judgment rendered on the 10th day of December, 1921, an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on April 10, 1922, a petition in error with case-made. On the 14th day of March, 1923, the plaintiff in error by his counsel of record moved the court to dismiss his appeal, which motion is sustained, and the appeal is hereby dismissed, and the cause remanded to the lower court, with direction to carry intoi effect its judgment. Mandate forthwith.

Ware v. State, 213 P. 1119, 23 Okla. Crim. 158, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 171 (Okla. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

213 P. 1119 (Ware v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.