Ware v. State
This text of 24 S.E.2d 139 (Ware v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was convicted in the criminal court of Fulton County of operating a lottery, known as the "number game," the judge presiding without a jury. The evidence amply authorized the judgment. The judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the petition for certiorari, which assigned error only upon the ground that the defendant's conviction was unauthorized by the evidence.
Judgment affirmed. MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ.,concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 S.E.2d 139, 68 Ga. App. 802, 1943 Ga. App. LEXIS 360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ware-v-state-gactapp-1943.