Ware v. State

388 S.E.2d 700, 259 Ga. 845
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 1, 1990
DocketS89A0223, S89A0225
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 388 S.E.2d 700 (Ware v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ware v. State, 388 S.E.2d 700, 259 Ga. 845 (Ga. 1990).

Opinion

Bell, Justice.

Johnny Ware and his brother, Parnell Ware, appeal their convictions for the murder of Paul Alexander.1 We affirm.

The evidence, when viewed most favorably to the prosecution, shows that Johnny Ware made an unsuccessful attempt to sell cocaine to the victim. The victim ran away with the cocaine, but Johnny Ware caught the victim and beat him. They were joined by Parnell Ware, who had been summoned by Johnny Ware. Parnell Ware shot the victim twice in the abdomen, with a pistol. The appellants recovered the cocaine, and ran from the scene of the shooting. The victim was later taken to a hospital, where he died from his gunshot wounds.

S89A0223. Johnny Ware

1. Johnny Ware was convicted of both malice murder and felony murder.2 Appellant contends that the evidence of the offenses was insufficient to meet the standard of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979), and that the trial court therefore erred by not granting a directed verdict on both offenses.

We disagree, as we conclude that a rational trier of fact could have found appellant guilty of malice murder and felony murder beyond a reasonable doubt. Id. The trial court ruled correctly in denying a directed verdict. Jackson v. State, 258 Ga. 810 (1) (375 SE2d [846]*846454) (1989).

Decided March 1, 1990. Word & Flinn, Gerald P. Word, Wiggins & Camp, Phil D. Wilkins, for appellants. William G. Hamrick, Jr., District Attorney, Peter J. Skandalakis, Agnes T. McCabe, Assistant District Attorneys, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Richard C. Litwin, for appellee.

2. Appellant’s enumeration that the court erred in allowing the jury to consider the evidence of malice murder and felony murder during the same trial is without merit.

S89A0225. Parnell Ware

3. Parnell Ware was convicted of malice murder. He asserts that the evidence of the crime was insufficient to meet the test of Jackson v. Virginia, supra, 443 U. S., and that the trial court erred by failing to grant a directed verdict on the charge.

However, we conclude that the evidence would authorize a rational trier of fact to find appellant guilty of malice murder beyond a reasonable doubt. Id. There was no error in denying a directed verdict. Jackson v. State, supra, 258 Ga.

4. Parnell Ware was acquitted of felony murder. Nevertheless, he contends that the evidence of this charge was insufficient to meet the Jackson v. Virginia standard, and that the trial court erred by not granting a directed verdict concerning the charge.

This enumeration has no merit, because the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to convict appellant of felony murder was mooted when the jury acquitted him on that charge.

5. Appellant’s argument that it was error to allow the jury to consider the evidence of both felony murder and malice murder is without merit.

Judgments affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yates v. State
55 A.3d 25 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
388 S.E.2d 700, 259 Ga. 845, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ware-v-state-ga-1990.