Ware v. State
Opinion
1. The court refused to allow a witness to testify that the defendant, about ten days prior to the homicide, told him that he (the defendant) had heard that the decedent was going to kill him, and that the witness advised him to take out a peace warrant. At this juncture of the trial no threat by tlie decedent was shown to have been made against tlie defendant, or communicated to him. The testimony sought of the witness was a self-serving declaration of the defendant, and was not competent evidence. Dixon v. State, 116 Ga. 186 (42 S. E. 357).
2. Xo error of law was committed; the verdict is supported by the evidence, and lias tlie approval of tlie trial judge.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
76 S.E. 857 (Ware v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.