Ware v. State

76 S.E. 857, 139 Ga. 109, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 549
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 11, 1912·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Evans, P. J,

1. The court refused to allow a witness to testify that the defendant, about ten days prior to the homicide, told him that he (the defendant) had heard that the decedent was going to kill him, and that the witness advised him to take out a peace warrant. At this juncture of the trial no threat by tlie decedent was shown to have been made against tlie defendant, or communicated to him. The testimony sought of the witness was a self-serving declaration of the defendant, and was not competent evidence. Dixon v. State, 116 Ga. 186 (42 S. E. 357).

2. Xo error of law was committed; the verdict is supported by the evidence, and lias tlie approval of tlie trial judge.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ware v. State, 76 S.E. 857, 139 Ga. 109, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 549 (Ga. 1912).

76 S.E. 857 (Ware v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Teasley v. State
202 Ga. 316 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1947)