Ware v. State
16 So. 3d 308, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 12661, 2009 WL 2632151
Opinion
We affirm the defendant’s conviction and sentence because we believe the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea. However, this affirmance is without prejudice to the defendant raising the ineffective assistance of counsel claim in a postconviction proceeding pursuant to rule *309 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ware v. State, 16 So. 3d 308, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 12661, 2009 WL 2632151 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
16 So. 3d 308 (Ware v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
JL v. State
16 So. 3d 308 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)