Ware v. Schoone
This text of 546 N.W.2d 142 (Ware v. Schoone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The cotut is equally divided on the question of whether the unpublished decision of the court of appeals should be affirmed or reversed, Chief Justice ROLAND B. DAY, Justice JON P. WILCOX, and Justice ANN WALSH BRADLEY being of the opinion that the decision should be affirmed, and Justice SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, Justice DONALD W. STEINMETZ, and Justice JANINE P. GESKE being of the opinion that the decision should be reversed. Justice WILLIAM A. BABLITCH did not participate.
Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
546 N.W.2d 142, 199 Wis. 2d 712, 1996 Wisc. LEXIS 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ware-v-schoone-wis-1996.