Ware v. Schoone

546 N.W.2d 142, 199 Wis. 2d 712, 1996 Wisc. LEXIS 31
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided March 29, 1996·No. No. 93-2873·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The cotut is equally divided on the question of whether the unpublished decision of the court of appeals should be affirmed or reversed, Chief Justice ROLAND B. DAY, Justice JON P. WILCOX, and Justice ANN WALSH BRADLEY being of the opinion that the decision should be affirmed, and Justice SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, Justice DONALD W. STEINMETZ, and Justice JANINE P. GESKE being of the opinion that the decision should be reversed. Justice WILLIAM A. BABLITCH did not participate.

Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ware v. Schoone, 546 N.W.2d 142, 199 Wis. 2d 712, 1996 Wisc. LEXIS 31 (Wis. 1996).

546 N.W.2d 142 (Ware v. Schoone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related