Ware v. Nottinger

35 Ill. 375
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1864
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 35 Ill. 375 (Ware v. Nottinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ware v. Nottinger, 35 Ill. 375 (Ill. 1864).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Breese

delivered the opinion of the Court:

No agreement that the court should try the issues made up in this cause, appears in the record, except the recital in the order of court, which order appears to have been made after the attorneys for the defendant had withdrawn from the case, which withdrawal took place before the court had disposed of the demurrers.

There is nothing then, in the record, to show that a jury was waived. If not waived, then the defendant’s constitutional right to have a jury to try the issues was invaded. Const, art., 13, § 6. No waiver of a jury, or of submission to the court alone, appears to have been made while the defendant had an attorney in court.

For this irregularity the judgment must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mascall v. Commissioners of Drainage District
14 N.E. 47 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1887)
Culver v. Colehour
5 N.E. 89 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1886)
Sargent v. Central Warehouse Co.
15 Ill. App. 553 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1885)
Bohmann v. City of Chicago
15 Ill. App. 48 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 Ill. 375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ware-v-nottinger-ill-1864.