Ware v. Nottinger
This text of 35 Ill. 375 (Ware v. Nottinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court:
No agreement that the court should try the issues made up in this cause, appears in the record, except the recital in the order of court, which order appears to have been made after the attorneys for the defendant had withdrawn from the case, which withdrawal took place before the court had disposed of the demurrers.
There is nothing then, in the record, to show that a jury was waived. If not waived, then the defendant’s constitutional right to have a jury to try the issues was invaded. Const, art., 13, § 6. No waiver of a jury, or of submission to the court alone, appears to have been made while the defendant had an attorney in court.
For this irregularity the judgment must be reversed.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 Ill. 375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ware-v-nottinger-ill-1864.