Ware v. M & N Plastics, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ware v. M & N Plastics, Inc.

633 So. 2d 516, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1770, 1994 WL 68339

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 9, 1994·No. No. 91-03775·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from an order of the judge of compensation claims (JCC), denying a claim for temporary total disability, temporary partial disability, wage-loss benefits, and chiropractic treatment. After careful review of the record, we are unable to agree with claimant that the JCC erred in accepting the testimony of two orthopedic surgeons and a neurologist over that of claimant’s treating chiropractor as to claimant’s entitlement to benefits and need for chiropractic treatment.

The order appealed from is therefore affirmed.

BOOTH and MINER, JJ., and SHIVERS, S.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from an order of the judge of compensation claims (JCC), denying a claim for temporary total disability, temporary partial disability, wage-loss benefits, and chiropractic treatment. After careful review of the record, we are unable to agree with claimant that the JCC erred in accepting the testimony of two orthopedic surgeons and a neurologist over that of claimant’s treating chiropractor as to claimant’s entitlement to benefits and need for chiropractic treatment.

The order appealed from is therefore affirmed.

BOOTH and MINER, JJ., and SHIVERS, S.J., concur.

Ware v. M & N Plastics, Inc., 633 So. 2d 516, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1770, 1994 WL 68339 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

633 So. 2d 516 (Ware v. M & N Plastics, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.