Ware v. Haskins

Ohio Supreme Court

Ware v. Haskins

175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 207

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 25, 1963·No. No. 38151·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an action in habeas corpus originating in this court. The sentence having expired and petitioner having been released from custody, the case is moot and habeas corpus does not lie.

The motion to dismiss the petition is sustained, and the petition is dismissed.

Motion sustained and petition dismissed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an action in habeas corpus originating in this court. The sentence having expired and petitioner having been released from custody, the case is moot and habeas corpus does not lie.

The motion to dismiss the petition is sustained, and the petition is dismissed.

Motion sustained and petition dismissed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.

Ware v. Haskins, 175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 207 (Ohio 1963).

Pincite

175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 207 (Ware v. Haskins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.