Ware v. Haskins

Ohio Supreme Court

Ware v. Haskins

175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 207

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 25, 1963

DocketNo. 38151

StatusPublished

This text of 175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 207 (Ware v. Haskins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ware v. Haskins, 175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 207 (Ohio 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an action in habeas corpus originating in this court. The sentence having expired and petitioner having been released from custody, the case is moot and habeas corpus does not lie.

The motion to dismiss the petition is sustained, and the petition is dismissed.

Motion sustained and petition dismissed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an action in habeas corpus originating in this court. The sentence having expired and petitioner having been released from custody, the case is moot and habeas corpus does not lie.

The motion to dismiss the petition is sustained, and the petition is dismissed.

Motion sustained and petition dismissed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ware-v-haskins-ohio-1963.