Ware v. Chason

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Ware v. Chason

80 S.E. 21, 14 Ga. App. 47, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 401

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 25, 1913

Docket5095

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 80 S.E. 21 (Ware v. Chason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ware v. Chason, 80 S.E. 21, 14 Ga. App. 47, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 401 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Russell, C. J.

1, Under the ruling in Erwin v. Harris, 87 Ga. 333 (2), delivery of a shipment to a carrier, with a bill of lading to the order of the shipper, attached to a draft, does not constitute delivery to the consignee, but the carrier is an agent of the shipper, and title does not pass to the would-be purchaser. See, also, Moss v. Sell, 8 Ga. App. 588 (70 S. E. 18).

2. One who purchases personal property presumably upon his personal credit and financial standing, and not as a cash transaction, is not bound to accept the property when shipped with a draft attached to the bill of lading.

3. Under the pleadings and the testimony adduced in behalf of the plaintiff, the court,did not err in awarding a nonsuit. Judgment affirmed.

Bush & Stapleton, for plaintiff, cited: Civil Code, §§ 3222-3; Castlen v. Marshburn, 8 Ga. App. 400. T. S. Hawes, Erle M. Donalson, for defendant, cited: Civil Code, §§ 4125-6; Moss v. Sell, 8 Ga. App. 588; Erwin v. Harris, 87 Ga. 333 (2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI