Ware v. Burnett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ware v. Burnett

236 A.D.2d 882, 653 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1880

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 7, 1997·Published

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We reject respondent’s contention that the Judicial Hearing Officer erred in admitting a laboratory report into evidence. The report was certified by a person who swore that "I have been delegated by the Director of the Laboratory the authority necessary to and, do hereby, certify and authenticate, the annexed report.” That certification complies with CPLR 4518 (c) (see, People v Kuras, 236 AD2d 873 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Trost, J.H.O.—Support.) Present—Den-man, P. J., Pine, Lawton, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We reject respondent’s contention that the Judicial Hearing Officer erred in admitting a laboratory report into evidence. The report was certified by a person who swore that "I have been delegated by the Director of the Laboratory the authority necessary to and, do hereby, certify and authenticate, the annexed report.” That certification complies with CPLR 4518 (c) (see, People v Kuras, 236 AD2d 873 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Trost, J.H.O.—Support.) Present—Den-man, P. J., Pine, Lawton, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Ware v. Burnett, 236 A.D.2d 882, 653 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1880 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

236 A.D.2d 882 (Ware v. Burnett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related