Ware v. Burnett
This text of 236 A.D.2d 882 (Ware v. Burnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We reject respondent’s contention that the Judicial Hearing Officer erred in admitting a laboratory report into evidence. The report was certified by a person who swore that "I have been delegated by the Director of the Laboratory the authority necessary to and, do hereby, certify and authenticate, the annexed report.” That certification complies with CPLR 4518 (c) (see, People v Kuras, 236 AD2d 873 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Trost, J.H.O.—Support.) Present—Den-man, P. J., Pine, Lawton, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
236 A.D.2d 882, 653 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ware-v-burnett-nyappdiv-1997.