Wardrick v. Valley Gun Smith

Fourth Circuit

Wardrick v. Valley Gun Smith

255 F. App'x 705

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 27, 2007·No. No. 07-7245·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Robert Junior Wardrick appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wardrick v. Valley Gun Smith, No. 1:07-ct-01747-AMD (D.Md. July 31, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Robert Junior Wardrick appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wardrick v. Valley Gun Smith, No. 1:07-ct-01747-AMD (D.Md. July 31, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Wardrick v. Valley Gun Smith, 255 F. App'x 705 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

255 F. App'x 705 (Wardrick v. Valley Gun Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related