Wardle v. MILLER
101 A.2d 720, 375 Pa. 565, 1954 Pa. LEXIS 388
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 4, 1954·No. Appeals, 292 and 293·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
Opinion
The question in this case is whether the court could say, as a matter of law, that the notice by an insured *568 of an accident inflicting injury upon another was given to the liability insurer “as soon as practicable” as required by the policy. The material facts were undisputed. Hence, the question involved was necessarily one of law for the court to decide. The opinion of Judge Flood fully justifies the affirmative answer given for the court below.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wardle v. MILLER, 101 A.2d 720, 375 Pa. 565, 1954 Pa. LEXIS 388 (Pa. 1954).
101 A.2d 720 (Wardle v. MILLER) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance Co.
371 A.2d 193 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)
Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance
344 A.2d 555 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1975)
Frey v. Security Insurance Company of Hartford
331 F. Supp. 140 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1971)
Thompson v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
279 A.2d 225 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1971)
Maize v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
35 Pa. D. & C.2d 576 (Fayette County Court, 1964)