Warder v. Blair

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Warder v. Blair

4 Pennyp. 182

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 6, 1884

DocketNo. 57

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 4 Pennyp. 182 (Warder v. Blair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Warder v. Blair, 4 Pennyp. 182 (Pa. 1884).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The plaintiffs were not only the vendors, but they were the manufacturers of the machine sold to the defendant. Where a manufacturer of a reaper sells one to a farmer, we think it is sold and bought with the understanding that it will do the kind of work for which it was made. Here, however, there was evidence of an agreement on the part of the’vendor that it would do as good work as another machine named. The jury have found that it was not as good, and did not do good work. The assignments are not sustained.

Judgment affirmed

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

The plaintiffs were not only the vendors, but they were the manufacturers of the machine sold to the defendant. Where a manufacturer of a reaper sells one to a farmer, we think it is sold and bought with the understanding that it will do the kind of work for which it was made. Here, however, there was evidence of an agreement on the part of the’vendor that it would do as good work as another machine named. The jury have found that it was not as good, and did not do good work. The assignments are not sustained.

Judgment affirmed

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Pennyp. 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warder-v-blair-pa-1884.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack