Warden v. . Andrews

156 S.E. 508, 200 N.C. 330, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 318
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 27, 1931·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BrogdeN, J.

An examination o-f the complaint discloses that the suit is instituted upon separate and independent contracts. Hence the complaint does not tell one connected story, nor do- the various causes of action affect all of the parties. Therefore, the trial judge ruled correctly in sustaining the demurrer. Quarry Co. v. Construction Co., 151 N. C., 345, 66 S. E., 217; Shore v. Holt, 185 N. C., 312, 117 S. E., 165; Bank v. Angelo, 193 N. C., 576, 137 S. E., 705; Sasser v. Bullard, 199 N. C., 562; McIntosh N. C. Practice and Procedure, 453.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Warden v. . Andrews, 156 S.E. 508, 200 N.C. 330, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 318 (N.C. 1931).

156 S.E. 508 (Warden v. . Andrews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morton v. Thornton
131 S.E.2d 378 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)