Warden v. . Andrews
This text of 156 S.E. 508 (Warden v. . Andrews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An examination o-f the complaint discloses that the suit is instituted upon separate and independent contracts. Hence the complaint does not tell one connected story, nor do- the various causes of action affect all of the parties. Therefore, the trial judge ruled correctly in sustaining the demurrer. Quarry Co. v. Construction Co., 151 N. C., 345, 66 S. E., 217; Shore v. Holt, 185 N. C., 312, 117 S. E., 165; Bank v. Angelo, 193 N. C., 576, 137 S. E., 705; Sasser v. Bullard, 199 N. C., 562; McIntosh N. C. Practice and Procedure, 453.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
156 S.E. 508, 200 N.C. 330, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warden-v-andrews-nc-1931.