Wardell v. Fosdick & Davis
This text of 13 Johns. 325 (Wardell v. Fosdick & Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence is sufficient to support the allegation of fraud against both the defendants, and there appears no legal ‘objection to this form of action. Where the party hhs been induced, by such a fraudulent representation, t® [328]*328pay his money, and accept a dééd, it is immaterial whether any, or what, cqvenánts are.contained In the.deed, .The purchaser so, defrauded, has’a right to treat the .deed as: a nullity, and may maintain An- action on the cá.sé for. the deceit. '.(Frost v. Raymond, 2 Caines' Rep. 193. Bostwick v. Lewis, 1 Day, 250. Com. Dig. Action on the Case for Deceit, (A. 8.)
-judgment’fot the,plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 Johns. 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wardell-v-fosdick-davis-nysupct-1816.