Wardell v. Demorest

139 So. 589, 104 Fla. 207
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 9, 1932·Published

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

-—This canse coming on to be heard npon motion of cotmsel for Appellee to dismiss the appeal herein and same having been dnly considered and it appearing that the briefs filed here on behalf of Appellants violate the provisions of Amended Rnle 20, and it appearing to the Court from an examination of the record in the case that the decree appealed from should be affirmed npon cohsideration of the cause npon the merits, it is therefore ordered and decreed by the Court that the said montion to dismiss the appeal herein should be and the same is hereby granted.

Buford, C.J. and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wardell v. Demorest, 139 So. 589, 104 Fla. 207 (Fla. 1932).

139 So. 589 (Wardell v. Demorest) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.