Wardell v. Demorest

Supreme Court of Florida

Wardell v. Demorest

139 So. 589, 104 Fla. 207

DecidedFebruary 9, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 139 So. 589 (Wardell v. Demorest) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wardell v. Demorest, 139 So. 589, 104 Fla. 207 (Fla. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

-—This canse coming on to be heard npon motion of cotmsel for Appellee to dismiss the appeal herein and same having been dnly considered and it appearing that the briefs filed here on behalf of Appellants violate the provisions of Amended Rnle 20, and it appearing to the Court from an examination of the record in the case that the decree appealed from should be affirmed npon cohsideration of the cause npon the merits, it is therefore ordered and decreed by the Court that the said montion to dismiss the appeal herein should be and the same is hereby granted.

Buford, C.J. and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam.

-—This canse coming on to be heard npon motion of cotmsel for Appellee to dismiss the appeal herein and same having been dnly considered and it appearing that the briefs filed here on behalf of Appellants violate the provisions of Amended Rnle 20, and it appearing to the Court from an examination of the record in the case that the decree appealed from should be affirmed npon cohsideration of the cause npon the merits, it is therefore ordered and decreed by the Court that the said montion to dismiss the appeal herein should be and the same is hereby granted.

Buford, C.J. and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 So. 589, 104 Fla. 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wardell-v-demorest-fla-1932.