Warde v. United States

158 F.2d 651, 81 U.S. App. D.C. 355
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided December 16, 1946·No. Nos. 9263, 9264·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants were convicted of keeping gaming tables. D.C.Code 1940, § 22— 1504. There are conflicts in the testimony, but the convictions are supported by sufficient evidence. The tenant of the premises was an incorporated club but there was evidence that appellants took part in carrying on its gambling activities. They were therefore responsible as principals. D.C.Code 1940, § 22 — 105. There was evidence of gambling on more than one occasion. Moreover, one occasion was enough. Nelson v. United States, 28 App.D.C. 32, 37. Testimony of appellant Walling at a previous trial, together with a bank statement to which it related, were rightly admitted since this testimony had some tendency to establish his guilt. Milton v. United States, 71 App.D.C. 394, 110 F.2d 556. Appellants’ other contentions are also without merit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Warde v. United States, 158 F.2d 651, 81 U.S. App. D.C. 355 (D.C. Cir. 1946).

158 F.2d 651 (Warde v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hall
761 P.2d 1283 (Montana Supreme Court, 1988)
Zeigler v. State
471 So. 2d 172 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Pendleton v. State
348 So. 2d 1206 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Clyde H. Hale, Jr. v. United States
406 F.2d 476 (Tenth Circuit, 1969)
Jim B. Edmonds v. United States
273 F.2d 108 (D.C. Circuit, 1959)
United States v. Grunewald
164 F. Supp. 644 (S.D. New York, 1958)
Plummer v. United States
189 F.2d 19 (D.C. Circuit, 1951)