Ward Vs. Villaflor

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ERIK DOUGLAS WARD, No. 80257 Appellant,

vs.

SVETLANA RITZA VILLAFLOR, Respondent.

FIL D JAN 2 3 620 ELlZTr A. BROWN

CL ,,F€ME COURT BY

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 4V CLERK

This is a pro se appeal from an order purportedly entered on September 24, 2019. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Charles J. Hoskin, Judge.

Review of the documents before this court reveals a potential jurisdictional defect. The district court docket sheet does not indicate that any order was entered in the district court on September 24, 2019. To the extent appellant appeals from the July 10, 2019, order extending the temporary protective order, such an order is not appealable. And no appealable order appears on the district court docket entries. Accordingly, as it appears this court lacks jurisdiction, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISED.

. )

A'Aisaut) J. 4464 , J• Stiglich Silver

SUPREME COURT OF Nene%

(0) 2947A AN.

va - 0 3 2.4V

min7 ;

cc: Hon. Charles J. Hoskin, District Judge, Family Court Division Erik Douglas Ward Svetlana Ritza Villaflor Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A .46t51.