Ward Vs. Villaflor
This text of Ward Vs. Villaflor (Ward Vs. Villaflor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ERIK DOUGLAS WARD, No. 80257 Appellant, vs. SVETLANA RITZA VILLAFLOR, Respondent. FIL D JAN 2 3 620 ELlZTr A. BROWN CL ,,F€ME COURT BY ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 4V CLERK
This is a pro se appeal from an order purportedly entered on September 24, 2019. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Charles J. Hoskin, Judge. Review of the documents before this court reveals a potential jurisdictional defect. The district court docket sheet does not indicate that any order was entered in the district court on September 24, 2019. To the extent appellant appeals from the July 10, 2019, order extending the temporary protective order, such an order is not appealable. And no appealable order appears on the district court docket entries. Accordingly, as it appears this court lacks jurisdiction, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISED.
. ) A'Aisaut) J. 4464 , J• Stiglich Silver
SUPREME COURT OF Nene%
(0) 2947A AN. va - 0 3 2.4V min7 ; cc: Hon. Charles J. Hoskin, District Judge, Family Court Division Erik Douglas Ward Svetlana Ritza Villaflor Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A .46t51. 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ward Vs. Villaflor, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-vs-villaflor-nev-2020.