Ward Vs. Villaflor
This text of Ward Vs. Villaflor (Ward Vs. Villaflor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ERIK DOUGLAS WARD, No. 79722 Appellant, VS. SVETLANA RITZA VILLAFLOR, Respondent. FILED OCT 1 5 B19 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT By .\ 1C DEPUIY CLatE1164 < 1
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Charles J. Hoskin, Judge. Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, appellant fails to identify any appealable order, and no appealable order appears in the district court docket entries. Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction, and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Piekttuy J Pickering •
J. Parraguirre Cadish
cc: Hon. Charles J. Hoskin, District Judge, Family Court Division Erik Douglas Ward Svetlana Ritza Villaflor Eighth District Court Clerk
lq-(42_scn,„
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ward Vs. Villaflor, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-vs-villaflor-nev-2019.