Ward v. West

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Ward v. West

1967 OK CR 2, 422 P.2d 220, 37 O.B.A.J. 2634, 1967 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 241

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 4, 1967

DocketNo. A-14148

StatusPublished

This text of 1967 OK CR 2 (Ward v. West) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ward v. West, 1967 OK CR 2, 422 P.2d 220, 37 O.B.A.J. 2634, 1967 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 241 (Okla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BUSSEY, Presiding Judge.

This is an original proceeding in which Arley Ward, an inmate of the State Penitentiary, seeks reversal of a judgment and sentence rendered against him in the District Court of Pontotoc County, on the 24th day of June, 1929, for the crime of Burglary in the Second Degree.

On the face of the petition it appears that judgment and sentence imposed in Dis[221]*221trict Court case No. 2091 has been fully satisfied; and further that the time within which an appeal could have been perfected has long since expired; and further, that the petitioner is not currently incarcerated under said judgment and sentence.

Under such circumstances the writ of habeas corpus will not issue. The relief prayed for is accordingly denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BUSSEY, Presiding Judge.

This is an original proceeding in which Arley Ward, an inmate of the State Penitentiary, seeks reversal of a judgment and sentence rendered against him in the District Court of Pontotoc County, on the 24th day of June, 1929, for the crime of Burglary in the Second Degree.

On the face of the petition it appears that judgment and sentence imposed in Dis[221]*221trict Court case No. 2091 has been fully satisfied; and further that the time within which an appeal could have been perfected has long since expired; and further, that the petitioner is not currently incarcerated under said judgment and sentence.

Under such circumstances the writ of habeas corpus will not issue. The relief prayed for is accordingly denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1967 OK CR 2, 422 P.2d 220, 37 O.B.A.J. 2634, 1967 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-v-west-oklacrimapp-1967.