Ward v. Wavy Broadcasting, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Ward v. Wavy Broadcasting, Inc.

86 F. App'x 662

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 10, 2004·No. No. 03-1772·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mark A. Ward appeals the district court’s order holding him in civil contempt of its September 30, 2002 pre-filing injunction order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ward v. WAVY Broad., Inc., No. CA-99-461-2 (E.D. Va. filed June 17, 2003 & entered June 18, 2003). We deny Ward’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Mark A. Ward appeals the district court’s order holding him in civil contempt of its September 30, 2002 pre-filing injunction order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ward v. WAVY Broad., Inc., No. CA-99-461-2 (E.D. Va. filed June 17, 2003 & entered June 18, 2003). We deny Ward’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Ward v. Wavy Broadcasting, Inc., 86 F. App'x 662 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

86 F. App'x 662 (Ward v. Wavy Broadcasting, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related