Ward v. Watley

Alabama Court of Appeals

Ward v. Watley

77 So. 451, 16 Ala. App. 301, 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 328

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided November 20, 1917·No. 8 Div. 402.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, J.

This is a suit instituted by appellee, in which damages were claimed for the alleged false arrest and malicious prosecution of appellee, which, it was averred, was caused by the appellant.

The brief filed on behalf of appellant discusses in a very general way, without citation of authority, the fifth, eleventh, twelfth, thirteenth, fourteenth, and eighteenth assignments of error. The brief does not strictly comply with the rules, but we have examined each of these assignments, and are of the opinion that no reversible error appears.

The remaining assignments of error are not argued or insisted upon in the brief, and are therefore waived, and the judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, J.

This is a suit instituted by appellee, in which damages were claimed for the alleged false arrest and malicious prosecution of appellee, which, it was averred, was caused by the appellant.

The brief filed on behalf of appellant discusses in a very general way, without citation of authority, the fifth, eleventh, twelfth, thirteenth, fourteenth, and eighteenth assignments of error. The brief does not strictly comply with the rules, but we have examined each of these assignments, and are of the opinion that no reversible error appears.

The remaining assignments of error are not argued or insisted upon in the brief, and are therefore waived, and the judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Ward v. Watley, 77 So. 451, 16 Ala. App. 301, 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 328 (Ala. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

77 So. 451 (Ward v. Watley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.