Ward v. Ware

Appellate Court of Illinois

Ward v. Ware

29 Ill. App. 22, 1887 Ill. App. LEXIS 388

DecidedMay 25, 1888

StatusPublished

This text of 29 Ill. App. 22 (Ward v. Ware) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ward v. Ware, 29 Ill. App. 22, 1887 Ill. App. LEXIS 388 (Ill. Ct. App. 1888).

Pincite

Opinion

•Wall, J.

These cases were tried by the court, a jury being waived, and appeals are prosecuted from the judgments rendered. Mo objection was taken to the judgment in either case, nor does it appear from the bill of exceptions that any exception was saved as to any of the matters now assigned for error. The clerk in making up the record states that a motion for new trial was made and overruled in each case, but the points urged do not appear, nor does it appear that any exception was taken to the action of the court in refusing the motions. Such motions and the exceptions in respect thereto must be preserved in the bill of exceptions, and error cannot be assigned with reference to matters such as here presented, unless exception was taken at the time. Daniels v. Shields, 38 Ill. 197; Nason v. Litz, 73 Ill. 371.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

•Wall, J.

These cases were tried by the court, a jury being waived, and appeals are prosecuted from the judgments rendered. Mo objection was taken to the judgment in either case, nor does it appear from the bill of exceptions that any exception was saved as to any of the matters now assigned for error. The clerk in making up the record states that a motion for new trial was made and overruled in each case, but the points urged do not appear, nor does it appear that any exception was taken to the action of the court in refusing the motions. Such motions and the exceptions in respect thereto must be preserved in the bill of exceptions, and error cannot be assigned with reference to matters such as here presented, unless exception was taken at the time. Daniels v. Shields, 38 Ill. 197; Nason v. Litz, 73 Ill. 371.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 Ill. App. 22, 1887 Ill. App. LEXIS 388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-v-ware-illappct-1888.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack