Ward v. Warden

158 A.2d 770, 222 Md. 595
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedSeptember 1, 1980
Docket[P.C. No. 80, September Term, 1959.]
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 158 A.2d 770 (Ward v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ward v. Warden, 158 A.2d 770, 222 Md. 595 (Md. 1980).

Opinion

222 Md. 595 (1960)
158 A.2d 770

WARD
v.
WARDEN OF MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION

[P.C. No. 80, September Term, 1959.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided March 18, 1960.

Before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

Application for leave to appeal from a denial of post conviction relief is denied for the reasons set out in the opinion of the court below. See also Ward v. State, 219 Md. 559. It is significant that, in that appeal, no contention was raised as to the validity of a search and seizure of his automobile, following his arrest for drunken driving. It cannot be raised in this proceeding. Mears v. Warden, 220 Md. 682. The same thing is true of the alleged lack of preliminary hearing. Cf. Culley v. Warden, 218 Md. 639.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Midgett v. Warden
217 F. Supp. 843 (D. Maryland, 1963)
Lipscomb v. Warden
171 A.2d 247 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 A.2d 770, 222 Md. 595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-v-warden-md-1980.