Ward v. . Ward

Superior Court of North Carolina

Ward v. . Ward

1 N.C. 59

Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided April 5, 1793·Published

Opinion

But the Court, ASHE, J., and WILLIAMS, J., stopped the Attorney-General, saying they differed with him in opinion, with respect to the operation of the statute of uses; but they were clearly of opinion without hearingHaywood further, that here the fee immediately passed to the grantee, and the reservation was void.

NOTE. — See the cases of Sasser v. Blyth, 2 N.C. 259, and Smithv. Grady, 13 N.C. 395, which seem to overrule this case.

Cited: Savage v. Lee, 90 N.C. 323.

(60)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

But the Court, ASHE, J., and WILLIAMS, J., stopped the Attorney-General, saying they differed with him in opinion, with respect to the operation of the statute of uses; but they were clearly of opinion without hearingHaywood further, that here the fee immediately passed to the grantee, and the reservation was void.

NOTE. — See the cases of Sasser v. Blyth, 2 N.C. 259, and Smithv. Grady, 13 N.C. 395, which seem to overrule this case.

Cited: Savage v. Lee, 90 N.C. 323.

(60)

Ward v. . Ward, 1 N.C. 59 (N.C. Ct. App. 1793).

Pincite

1 N.C. 59 (Ward v. . Ward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related