Ward v. . Ward

Superior Court of North Carolina

Ward v. . Ward

1 N.C. 59

DecidedApril 5, 1793

StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.C. 59 (Ward v. . Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ward v. . Ward, 1 N.C. 59 (N.C. Ct. App. 1793).

Pincite

Opinion

But the Court, ASHE, J., and WILLIAMS, J., stopped the Attorney-General, saying they differed with him in opinion, with respect to the operation of the statute of uses; but they were clearly of opinion without hearingHaywood further, that here the fee immediately passed to the grantee, and the reservation was void.

NOTE. — See the cases of Sasser v. Blyth, 2 N.C. 259, and Smithv. Grady, 13 N.C. 395, which seem to overrule this case.

Cited: Savage v. Lee, 90 N.C. 323.

(60)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

But the Court, ASHE, J., and WILLIAMS, J., stopped the Attorney-General, saying they differed with him in opinion, with respect to the operation of the statute of uses; but they were clearly of opinion without hearingHaywood further, that here the fee immediately passed to the grantee, and the reservation was void.

NOTE. — See the cases of Sasser v. Blyth, 2 N.C. 259, and Smithv. Grady, 13 N.C. 395, which seem to overrule this case.

Cited: Savage v. Lee, 90 N.C. 323.

(60)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.C. 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-v-ward-ncsuperct-1793.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack