Ward v. Ward
145 F. 1023, 74 C.C.A. 146, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4067
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided May 22, 1906·No. Nos. 61, 62·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
A majority of the court, after a careful examination of the record, have reached the conclusion that the decrees below ought not to be disturbed, and concur in the views expressed in the opinion of the court below. The decrees are accordingly affirmed with costs. For opinion below, see 131 Fed. 946.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ward v. Ward, 145 F. 1023, 74 C.C.A. 146, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4067 (2d Cir. 1906).
145 F. 1023 (Ward v. Ward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tide Water Oil Co. v. Commissioner
29 B.T.A. 1208 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1934)
Summerfield Co. v. Commissioner
29 B.T.A. 77 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1933)