Ward v. Wake Co. B.O.E.

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Ward v. Wake Co. B.O.E.

North Carolina Industrial Commission·Decided July 11, 2003·No. I.C. NOS. 466695 735240·Published

Opinion

*********** Plaintiffs appeal is hereby DENIED. However, the dismissal is deemed to be WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff shall have one year from the date of this order to refile his claim.

S/_______________ CHRISTOPHER SCOTT COMMISSIONER

CONCURRING:

S/______________________ LAURA KRANIFELD MAVRETIC COMMISSIONER

S/_____________ PAMELA T. YOUNG COMMISSIONER

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*********** Plaintiffs appeal is hereby DENIED. However, the dismissal is deemed to be WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff shall have one year from the date of this order to refile his claim.

S/_______________ CHRISTOPHER SCOTT COMMISSIONER

CONCURRING:

S/______________________ LAURA KRANIFELD MAVRETIC COMMISSIONER

S/_____________ PAMELA T. YOUNG COMMISSIONER

Ward v. Wake Co. B.O.E., (N.C. Super. Ct. 2003).

Pincite

Ward v. Wake Co. B.O.E. (Ward v. Wake Co. B.O.E.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.