Ward v. Tinnen

Texas Supreme Court

Ward v. Tinnen

10 Tex. 187

DecidedJuly 1, 1853

StatusPublished

This text of 10 Tex. 187 (Ward v. Tinnen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ward v. Tinnen, 10 Tex. 187 (Tex. 1853).

Pincite

Opinion

Wiieeder, J.

It is unnecessary to Inquire into the sufficiency of the service or the regularity of the judgment, as to Shelton. He has not appealed or otherwise complained of the judgment; and the plaintiff in error, who was the party primarily liable, as maker of the note, and against whom the judgment is regular and legal, cannot complain of errors affecting only his co-defendant and which have in no way operated to his prejudice. (Hendrick v. Cannon, 5 Tex. R., 248.)

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wiieeder, J.

It is unnecessary to Inquire into the sufficiency of the service or the regularity of the judgment, as to Shelton. He has not appealed or otherwise complained of the judgment; and the plaintiff in error, who was the party primarily liable, as maker of the note, and against whom the judgment is regular and legal, cannot complain of errors affecting only his co-defendant and which have in no way operated to his prejudice. (Hendrick v. Cannon, 5 Tex. R., 248.)

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 Tex. 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-v-tinnen-tex-1853.