Ward v. Superior Court
58 Cal. 519, 1881 Cal. LEXIS 255
Opinion
One of the conditions of the undertaking on appeal was, that the appellant would pay all costs recovered against him in the appellate court. Neither the circumstance that the amount of the bond was more than one hundred dollars, nor the other circumstance, that it was insufficient in amount to operate a stay of execution, rendered the appeal ineffectual.
Writ denied and proceedings dismissed.
McKinstry, J., and McKee, J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ward v. Superior Court, 58 Cal. 519, 1881 Cal. LEXIS 255 (Cal. 1881).
58 Cal. 519 (Ward v. Superior Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rich v. Superior Court
161 P. 291 (California Court of Appeal, 1916)
Edwards v. Superior Court, in & for the Cty. of Alameda
115 P. 649 (California Supreme Court, 1911)
Thomas, Jr. v. Hawkins
107 P. 578 (California Court of Appeal, 1909)
Pacific Window Glass Co. v. Smith
97 P. 898 (California Court of Appeal, 1908)
Edminston v. Steele
87 P. 677 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1906)
Rutledge v. Superior Court of Humboldt County
7 P. 144 (California Supreme Court, 1885)
Beatty v. Superior Court
2 Cal. Unrep. 159 (California Supreme Court, 1883)