Ward v. Superior Court

58 Cal. 519, 1881 Cal. LEXIS 255
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1881
DocketNo. 7,729
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 58 Cal. 519 (Ward v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ward v. Superior Court, 58 Cal. 519, 1881 Cal. LEXIS 255 (Cal. 1881).

Opinion

Ross, J.:

One of the conditions of the undertaking on appeal was, that the appellant would pay all costs recovered against him in the appellate court. Neither the circumstance that the amount of the bond was more than one hundred dollars, nor the other circumstance, that it was insufficient in amount to operate a stay of execution, rendered the appeal ineffectual.

Writ denied and proceedings dismissed.

McKinstry, J., and McKee, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rich v. Superior Court
161 P. 291 (California Court of Appeal, 1916)
Edwards v. Superior Court, in & for the Cty. of Alameda
115 P. 649 (California Supreme Court, 1911)
Thomas, Jr. v. Hawkins
107 P. 578 (California Court of Appeal, 1909)
Pacific Window Glass Co. v. Smith
97 P. 898 (California Court of Appeal, 1908)
Edminston v. Steele
87 P. 677 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1906)
Rutledge v. Superior Court of Humboldt County
7 P. 144 (California Supreme Court, 1885)
Beatty v. Superior Court
2 Cal. Unrep. 159 (California Supreme Court, 1883)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 Cal. 519, 1881 Cal. LEXIS 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-v-superior-court-cal-1881.