Ward v. Strobel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ward v. Strobel

275 A.D.2d 988

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 24, 1949

StatusPublished

This text of 275 A.D.2d 988 (Ward v. Strobel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ward v. Strobel, 275 A.D.2d 988 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

All concur, except Taylor, P. J., and McCurn, J., who dissent and vote for reversal and for granting a new trial on the ground that the proofs presented questions of fact for the jury as to the status of plaintiff under the “ guest statute ” of the State of Indiana and as to the degree of negligence, if any, of the defendant under the laws of Indiana. (The judgment is for defendant for no cause of action, in an automobile negligence action.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Piper, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

All concur, except Taylor, P. J., and McCurn, J., who dissent and vote for reversal and for granting a new trial on the ground that the proofs presented questions of fact for the jury as to the status of plaintiff under the “ guest statute ” of the State of Indiana and as to the degree of negligence, if any, of the defendant under the laws of Indiana. (The judgment is for defendant for no cause of action, in an automobile negligence action.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Piper, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 A.D.2d 988, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-v-strobel-nyappdiv-1949.