Ward v. State.dissent
This text of 2017 Ark. 136 (Ward v. State.dissent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cite as 2017 Ark. 136
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-98-657
Opinion Delivered: April 17, 2017
BRUCE EARL WARD MOTION TO RECALL THE APPELLANT MANDATE AND FOR STAY OF EXECUTION [PULASKI COUNTY V. CIRCUIT COURT NO. CR-89-1836]
STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE
DISSENTING OPINION.
SHAWN A. WOMACK, Associate Justice
Bruce Earl Ward and Don William Davis filed their motions jointly, but this court
has chosen to dispose of them separately. Due to the identical legal issues involved, I discuss
the facts and legal arguments of both Ward and Davis in my dissent in Davis v. State, 2017
Ark. 135 (Womack, J., dissenting), handed down this same day.
I dissent.
WOOD, J., joins in this dissent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 Ark. 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-v-statedissent-ark-2017.