Ward v. State

133 S.W.2d 790, 1939 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 683

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ward v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 144 Tex. Crim. 444 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 29, 1939·No. No. 20627·Published

Opinion

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of sodomy, and, because of repetition of offenses, his punishment was assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for life.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exceptions, hence no question is presented for review. The indictment seems to be in proper form.

All matters of procedure appearing regular, the judgment will be in all things affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of sodomy, and, because of repetition of offenses, his punishment was assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for life.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exceptions, hence no question is presented for review. The indictment seems to be in proper form.

All matters of procedure appearing regular, the judgment will be in all things affirmed.

Ward v. State, 133 S.W.2d 790, 1939 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 683 (Tex. 1939).

Pincite

133 S.W.2d 790 (Ward v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.