Ward v. State

68 S.W.2d 1046, 125 Tex. Crim. 593, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 196
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 14, 1934·No. No. 16460.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Robbery is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

The indictment is regular and regularly presented.

The motion for a continuance was overruled, but in the absence of the evidence that was heard upon the trial the complaint of the court’s ruling cannot be appraised on appeal.

The record shows an application for a severance but the ruling upon it is not disclosed, nor is there any complaint of the ruling thereon.

Some special charges were given and some were refused. Whether they were pertinent or not is not ascertainable upon the record before us for the reason that we are not apprised of the facts that were before the trial court.

Perceiving no error, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ward v. State, 68 S.W.2d 1046, 125 Tex. Crim. 593, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 196 (Tex. 1934).

68 S.W.2d 1046 (Ward v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clark v. State
298 S.W.2d 828 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1957)