Ward v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Ward v. State

1920 OK CR 11, 186 P. 489, 17 Okla. Crim. 697, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 18

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 19, 1920

DocketNo. A-3385.

StatusPublished

This text of 1920 OK CR 11 (Ward v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ward v. State, 1920 OK CR 11, 186 P. 489, 17 Okla. Crim. 697, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 18 (Okla. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff 'in error. AYard. was tried' and convicted on an information charging that in ('reek county, -on or about the 20th day of November. 1917, he did have in his possession, at his place of business in the town of Shamrock, five quarts of whisky with intent to sell the same, and 'in accordance with tlie verdict of the jury lie'was sentenced to lie confined for 90 days in the county jail and pay ¡i fine of $100. From the judgment an appeal was perfected by filing in this court, on June 7, 3918, a petition in error with case-made.

No brief lias been filed. When the ease was called for final submission, the Attorney General moved to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal. For the reason stated therein the motion is sustained, and the judgment of the lower court affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff 'in error. AYard. was tried' and convicted on an information charging that in ('reek county, -on or about the 20th day of November. 1917, he did have in his possession, at his place of business in the town of Shamrock, five quarts of whisky with intent to sell the same, and 'in accordance with tlie verdict of the jury lie'was sentenced to lie confined for 90 days in the county jail and pay ¡i fine of $100. From the judgment an appeal was perfected by filing in this court, on June 7, 3918, a petition in error with case-made.

No brief lias been filed. When the ease was called for final submission, the Attorney General moved to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal. For the reason stated therein the motion is sustained, and the judgment of the lower court affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1920 OK CR 11, 186 P. 489, 17 Okla. Crim. 697, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-v-state-oklacrimapp-1920.