Ward v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Ward v. State

1917 OK CR 31, 161 P. 822, 13 Okla. Crim. 109, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 7

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 24, 1917

DocketNo. A-2688.

StatusPublished

This text of 1917 OK CR 31 (Ward v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ward v. State, 1917 OK CR 31, 161 P. 822, 13 Okla. Crim. 109, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 7 (Okla. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, H. B. Ward, was convicted on a charge of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquor to one George Hays, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $350, and confinement in the county jail for 120 days.

No briefs have been filed nor oral argument made in support of the errors assigned. We have examined the record, and find there is testimony tending to support the allegations of the information, and further find that no objection was made or exception taken to the instructions as given by the court. Upon the whole record we have discovered no error which will warrant a reversal of the judgment.

The judgment of the lower court is therefore, affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, H. B. Ward, was convicted on a charge of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquor to one George Hays, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $350, and confinement in the county jail for 120 days.

No briefs have been filed nor oral argument made in support of the errors assigned. We have examined the record, and find there is testimony tending to support the allegations of the information, and further find that no objection was made or exception taken to the instructions as given by the court. Upon the whole record we have discovered no error which will warrant a reversal of the judgment.

The judgment of the lower court is therefore, affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1917 OK CR 31, 161 P. 822, 13 Okla. Crim. 109, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-v-state-oklacrimapp-1917.