Ward v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Ward v. State

1914 OK CR 96, 142 P. 971, 10 Okla. Crim. 695, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 220

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 25, 1914

DocketNo. A-2117.

StatusPublished

This text of 1914 OK CR 96 (Ward v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ward v. State, 1914 OK CR 96, 142 P. 971, 10 Okla. Crim. 695, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 220 (Okla. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CIJRIAM.

Plaintiff in error, George AAard, was convicted at the July, 1913, term of the county court of Pittsburg county, on a charge of having the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor with the intent to sell the same, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $75 and imprisonment in the eounty jail for >a period of thirty days. Judgment’was pronounced by the trial court on the 25th day of August, 1913. No order was made at the time extending the sixty days allowed' by the statute within which the appeal should be perfected in this court. The appeal was not filed here until the 27th day of August, 1913, more than sixty days subsequent to the rendition of the judgment. The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the same was not perfected within the time allowed by the law. The motion was well founded and is sustained. The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CIJRIAM.

Plaintiff in error, George AAard, was convicted at the July, 1913, term of the county court of Pittsburg county, on a charge of having the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor with the intent to sell the same, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $75 and imprisonment in the eounty jail for >a period of thirty days. Judgment’was pronounced by the trial court on the 25th day of August, 1913. No order was made at the time extending the sixty days allowed' by the statute within which the appeal should be perfected in this court. The appeal was not filed here until the 27th day of August, 1913, more than sixty days subsequent to the rendition of the judgment. The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the same was not perfected within the time allowed by the law. The motion was well founded and is sustained. The appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1914 OK CR 96, 142 P. 971, 10 Okla. Crim. 695, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-v-state-oklacrimapp-1914.