Ward v. State

226 S.W.3d 242, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 875, 2007 WL 1673943
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ward v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 777
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 12, 2007·No. No. ED 88468·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Darrick Ward (“movant”) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his request for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims the trial court clearly erred in denying his request for post-conviction relief because the trial court improperly revoked his probation.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

[243]*243The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ward v. State, 226 S.W.3d 242, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 875, 2007 WL 1673943 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

226 S.W.3d 242 (Ward v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.