Ward v. State
29 S.E. 756, 103 Ga. 559, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 421
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ward v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 112 Ga. 75 →
Opinion
When this case was here before (102 Ga. 531), it was held that the verdict could not stand, because the evidence failed to show affirmatively that the accused committed or participated in the perpetration of the homicide. There is no substantial difference between the evidence as it appeared in the former record and the evidence as it now appears, and it was error to overrule the motion for a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ward v. State, 29 S.E. 756, 103 Ga. 559, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 421 (Ga. 1897).
29 S.E. 756 (Ward v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.