Ward v. State
103 So. 3d 273, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 22004, 2012 WL 6682022
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ward v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10331 →
Opinion
Affirmed. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); see also Nelson v. State, 875 So.2d 579, 583 (Fla.2004) (“Under the circumstances of this case, a defendant would be required to allege what testimony defense counsel could have elicited from witnesses and how defense counsel’s failure to call, interview, or present the witnesses who would have so testified prejudiced the case.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ward v. State, 103 So. 3d 273, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 22004, 2012 WL 6682022 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).
103 So. 3d 273 (Ward v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Nelson v. State
875 So. 2d 579 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)