Ward v. State
529 So. 2d 820, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1919, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3688, 1988 WL 84226
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ward v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 519 So. 2d 1082 →
Opinion
Appellant raises two issues in his criminal appeal. We find no merit in the first issue and affirm.1 Regarding the second issue, the state concedes that the trial court erred in imposing costs at the sentencing hearing without prior notice. See Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988); Harris v. State, 498 So.2d 1371 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). We therefore vacate the trial court’s assessment of costs.
[821]*821AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ward v. State, 529 So. 2d 820, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1919, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3688, 1988 WL 84226 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
529 So. 2d 820 (Ward v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clark v. State
363 So. 2d 331 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1978)
Mays v. State
519 So. 2d 618 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Harris v. State
498 So. 2d 1371 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)