Ward v. State
320 So. 2d 448, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15443
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ward v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 287 So. 2d 138 →
Opinion
Upon review and consideration of the briefs, record and oral argument we are of the opinion that the error in failing to instruct the jury on certain lesser offenses and degrees was harmless in that the error did not injuriously affect the substantial rights of the defendant, Gilford v. State, Fla.1975, 313 So.2d 729; Spigner v. State, Fla.App. 1974, 304 So.2d 496. Having considered the other appellate points and finding no reversible error, the judgment and conviction are affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ward v. State, 320 So. 2d 448, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15443 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).
320 So. 2d 448 (Ward v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Spigner v. State
304 So. 2d 496 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Gilford v. State
313 So. 2d 729 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)