Ward v. State

130 So. 915, 100 Fla. 1367
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedNovember 26, 1930
StatusPublished

This text of 130 So. 915 (Ward v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ward v. State, 130 So. 915, 100 Fla. 1367 (Fla. 1930).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice Terrell, Mr. justice Whitfield and Mr. Justice Buford are of Opinion that the judgment of the court below should be affirmed; while Mr. Justice Ellis, Mr. Justice Strum and Mr. justice Brown are of opinion that said judgment should be reversed. When it appears that the Members of the Court are permanently and equally 'divided in Opinion as to whether a judgment should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the judgment should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged *1368 under the authority of State ex rel., Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51 that the judgment of the Criminal Court of Record in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung
47 Fla. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
130 So. 915, 100 Fla. 1367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-v-state-fla-1930.