Ward v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA DERIECE WARD; Plaintiff, 4:24-CV-3035 vs. ORDER STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation (filing 12), recommending that the Court grant the plaintiff's motion to remand (filing 5). There has been no objection. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); NECivR 72.2. When a party fails to timely object to the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge, the party waives its right to de novo review by the district court of any portion of the report and recommendation. United States v. Wise, 588 F.3d 531, 537 n.5 (8th Cir. 2009). Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation (filing 12) are adopted. 2. The plaintiff's motion to remand (filing 5) is granted.
3. This case is remanded to the District Court for Lancaster County, Nebraska. 4, A separate judgment will be entered.
Dated this 15th day of April, 2024.
BY THE COURT:
nior United States District Judge
_Q-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ward v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Ward v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.