Ward v. State
This text of Ward v. State (Ward v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
O R D E R This 28th day of May 2015, upon consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the State’s motion to affirm, and the record below, it appears
to the Court that:
entence. He argued that his life sentence is illegal because
he was convicted of the nonexistent crime of attempted felony murder.3 The
Superior Court denied Ward’s motion because it was untimely and repetitive and because his sentence was appropriate. This appeal followed.
(4) In his opening brief on appeal, Ward again asserts that his
sentence is illegal because he was convicted of attempted felony murder,
which is not a recognized crime in Delaware.4 He also contends that the
Superior Court erred in concluding that his motion was untimely because
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ward v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-v-state-del-2015.